I'm Not Sorry (Poem)

My life is a tiny room
Filled with monsters and lies,
Violent fights and tempting triggers.

The floor is the sun's surface;
I can only keep my feet
By stepping on the monsters beneath me.

They try to pull me to the floor,
Beat me, bruise me, battery, battery,
But I refuse to fall down!

Your ruthlessness makes me laugh.
Keep trying, I swear
It only makes me stronger.

When I reach the top, 
All else will tumble and crumble,
And I will claim my victory.

It was your fault
You didn't believe me
That I would never, ever, fall down.

It was your choice
To learn it this way,
But I will never, ever, be sorry.

Summary: Before I Fall by Lauren Oliver

Samantha Kingston has everything a high-school girl dreams of. She has popularity, the dreamy boyfriend, three great friends, and anything else she asks for. She and her friends are that group of girls you know who always dress nice, make fun of people who don't, make fun of people who annoy them, go to all the parties, drink, get in trouble, etc.

Cupid's Day is the most exciting day at Sam's school because the amount of flowers she gets that day are a reflection of how popular she is. This is so important to her compared to other things, that she looks forward to Cupid's Day all year. Of course there is a party that night, to which she and her friends go, and that's where the excitement happens. Juliet Sykes, a girl who Sam and her friends bully all the time, shows up at the party and dares to call the girls names. So, in return, they dump their beer all over her while others join in and push and shove her out of the party.

After the party, the friends leave drunk, and they wreck, and Sam dies. However, she wakes up, after dying, on Cupid's day again. And again. And again. This happens over and over, all the while Sam is slowly putting the pieces together on what she has to do to get this to stop. She finds out that Juliet Sykes died, and that both their deaths are intertwined somehow. She spends her time trying to save one or both of them, and finally reaches the day that she figures out the resolution... but I don't want to spoil it for you.

Throughout the book, Samantha learns of the importance of life and love. She finds that the true meaning of life is not about herself, but about the people around her.

Book Review: Hopeless

Sky, an intelligent, witty, and intense high-school girl, seems to have a normal life until she meets Dean Holder, who changes her life forever. The novel Hopeless by Colleen Hoover was not what I expected, and a bit disappointing; however, it was very interesting and a good read.

Colleen’s style of writing is magnificent; written in first person, this storyline is beautiful. It’s a love story, which is my preference because I’m a hopeless romantic. Sky falls in love with Dean, a mysterious and even more intense guy.

 Here’s the bad part. The morals are corrupt. As a Christian, I believe Hopeless could have been just a little less hopeless without the language, the sex, and the comments about "God". I'm not saying this because I'm trying to preach, I'm saying this because the bad morals dumb down the idea of true love and good decisions. So, to us Christians (and there are a lot of us), those ideas aren't as perfect in the novel as some people (most likely non-Christians) will see it.

Furthermore, although there is a different storyline that can be interpreted from this book, I can’t neglect the fact that it almost seems as if the sexual intercourse defined their relationship. Like, it was as if they survived from that…eww. I really wasn’t looking for a sex novel, thank you. If you’re into that kind of stuff, go for it! But me? Well, I admit I should have read the reviews first, or just googled the book because when I do, I find that the suggested novels include ones like 50 Shades of Grey! Ehh. . .red flags. All over the place.

I understand that a lot of people may disagree with me because all of this is purely my opinion. If you like these kinds of books, are looking for a romance novel that includes some action (of various sorts), then read it. I can almost promise you that you’ll love it. However, I’d say that if you’re like me and a Christian, and not looking for a sex novel, don’t read it. 

CC 3.2 "Realistic" Children?

Media has everything from websites, to advertisements, to TV shows, to movies, to magazines, and much more. "Gender Issues In The Media", an article written by Shari Graydon and Elizabeth Verrall, talks about the negative impacts and influences that the media has on children and the way they develop.

Messages from the media tend to be extremely stereotypical in the way they portray males and females, even when directed towards children. According to the text, "girls are shown as being endlessly preoccupied by their appearance, and fascinated primarily by dolls and jewellery." A girl's true personality and interests being disregarded, she may feel forced to act like the girls she sees on the media. If she doesn't want to, she might even feel like something is wrong with her because she can't meet the standards that the media sets for her, lowering her self-esteem.

Also, the article states that "boys are encouraged to play sports and become engrossed by war play and technology." The same effect that was mentioned about girls can happen to boys. They are encouraged to be rough and rowdy; therefore, they are more likely to show aggressive behavior.

However, children don't just see what is meant for children, they also are exposed to many adult things. The article states that children often watch/see media that is "intended for adult eyes only. These images also help shape the notions little girls and boys have about who they should be and what they can achieve". This has gotten so bad that I have even witnessed 5-year-old boys trying to look down women's shirts. Children are not supposed to even KNOW about anything sexual at that age. It's become so common now, it's like you can't find a PG movie without a sexual reference in it. Even Disney TV shows now!

On the bright side, children can be more influenced by positive things, and there are ways to minimize the effects of the stereotypical media on children. The text says, "Research tells us that the more television children watch, the more likely they are to demonstrate aggressive behaviour." So, just don't let them watch so much inappropriate media. After limiting what they watch, you can fill in the time gaps with more youthful and fulfilling, real-life events. Spend time with your children and educate them on the social media, showing them the differences between the stereotypes and reality as they grow.

In conclusion, no matter what the media wants to represent as a male and a female, you can set it straight. Children don't need to be exposed to something that will negatively alter their way of thinking. They will grow up too fast and not the way the way they should. If everyone grew up thinking they had to act like the characters on a "reality" show, what would the world even be like today?

CC 3.1 For Everyone and Females

In an article called, "Ummmm, Wikipedia Removes Female Novelists from 'American Novelists' List," posted on Sparklife, Janet Manley focuses on an issue that made its appearance on Wikipedia, as Amanda Filipacchi, a novelist, watched the "American Novelist" page dwindle to males only, and a new page open which was entitled "Female American Novelists." However, I would say that Manley is overreacting just little bit.

Sometimes a person will have an idea that seems good at the time, and he or she later realizes that it wasn't such a great idea after all. First off, she states that "Wikipedia apparently set the wheels in reverse, putting
“American Women Novelists” back onto the main page." This means that the administrators recognized that they were at fault, and fixed the problem. Sure, we might wonder what was going through their heads when they decided to change it, but seeing that they changed their minds shows evidence that maybe their intent wasn't so bad after all. Maybe once they realized that there might be controversy, they reversed what they'd done.

Secondly, there is a difference between gender equality and everyone being exactly the same. Janet wants to know "how [women have] gotten this far in history without female cars or female books or hotdogs for women." I'd like to point out that there actually are female books. There are also men's books, but that's because there ARE differences between men and women. We think differently, have different physical advantages and disadvantages, and possess many other differences that studies have proven true. It's inevitable.


To clarify, I did not say that I completely disagree with Manley. There were two major problems with the situation. First of all, she states that "female authors from Haiti and other countries were also being bumped to subtopics on their respective pages." I can definitely see why people, specifically the novelists listed, would be upset about this. They'd think "Why am I less important now?" because they were moved to a subtopic page!

Also, I'll admit the way they chose to categorize things was pretty... dumb. The article says in parentheses that the women were not only separated from the men novelists (in subtopic pages), but the men were " not, Filpacchi notes, under 'Men Novelists'." Yeah, they were just Novelists. This should also cause an obvious problem because although we are not necessarily in the "Feminist Movement" anymore, our society is recently very passionate about gender equality. Not saying I am; not saying I'm not, but it is a big deal nowadays.

All in all, this article was pretty entertaining. Manley is a funny writer, her sense of humor outweighing the exhibited anger. However, maybe she could consider what she complains about, and whether it's really worth all the fuss. It's possible that she just wanted something to write about, and tried to amplify an issue to make it entertaining to her viewers. Who knows? All I know is my stance on the subject, and that is that this article is quite an overreaction. I would like to know though, how would you react if you were moved from main topic to subtopic?